Lead Author | Year | Study Design | LOE | MINORS Score | Patient(knees)No. | Mean Age, y | Male/Female No. | Mean Follow-up, mo |
---|
Zhang | 2021 | Cohort studyb | 3 | 20/24 | 66(66) | 21 | 59/7 | 37 |
Hao | 2022 | Cohort studyb | 3 | 19/24 | 31(31) | 24 | 4/27 | 43 |
Deng | 2021 | Case series | 4 | 12/16 | 13(13) | 19 | 4/9 | 27 |
Zhang | 2023 | Case seriesc | 4 | 13/16 | 92(102) | 21 | 8/94 | 49 |
Nelitz | 2015 | Case series | 4 | 12/16 | 12(12) | 18 | 0/12 | 16 |
Li | 2021 | Case series | 4 | 12/16 | 17(17) | 18 | 5/12 | 18 |
- aLOE, level of evidence; MINORS, Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies;
- bThis study compared the results of patients undergoing derotational femoral osteotomy vs. a nonderotational osteotomy procedure
- cThis study reported clinical results after combined derotational distal femoral osteotomy, which included 102 derotational femoral osteotomies, and an additional tibial tubercle osteotomy was performed in 26 knees. All patients who underwent derotational distal femoral osteotomy were included in the systematic review