Skip to main content

Table 2 Example of calculations of MCID and CID in pain score in OA patients

From: Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions

Reference (treatment)

Method

Categories in anchor

Definition of MCID or CID for improvement

MCID or CID

Pain on VAS (0–100 mm scale)

Tubach 2005 (NSAIDs) [10]

Anchor—PGA

None, poor, fair, good, excellent

75th percentile of the change in score among patients whose evaluation of response to treatment (on PGA) was “good” (MCID)

−19.9 mm (knee) − 15.3 mm (hip)

Pain on NRS (0–10 pt)

Farrar 2001 [11]

Anchor―PGIC

Very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse

Decrease in pain score for patients “much improved” (CID)

2 pt

 

Decrease in pain score for patients “very much improved” (CID)

≥4 pt

ROC—PGIC

Very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse

Decrease in pain score for patients “much improved” (CID)

≥1.7 pt

Pain on WOMAC (on 0–100 pt scale, unless otherwise noted)

Ehrich 2000 (NSAIDs) [12]

Anchor—PGA

None, poor, fair, good, excellent

Difference btw “none” and “poor” response on PGA (MCID)

9.7 mm

Angst 2001 (inpatient rehabilitation) [13]

Anchor—transition question

Much worse, slightly worse, equal, slightly better, much better

Difference btw “equal” and “slightly better” groups (MCID)

0.75 pta

Escobar 2007 (TKR) [14]

Anchor—transition question

A great deal better, somewhat better, equal, somewhat worse, a great deal worse

Difference btw baseline score and scores for patients declaring changes “somewhat better” (MCID)

23 pt

Quintana 2012 (THR) [15]a

Anchor—transition question

Seven items from “a great deal better” to “a great deal worse”

Mean change score for patients whose response was “a little better” (MCID)

15, 23, 36 ptb

Anchor—PASS question

Totally satisfied, slightly satisfied, not satisfied, not at all satisfied

Mean change in score for the 75th percentile of patients in the probability curve reporting being totally satisfied or slightly satisfied (MCID)

20, 25, 25 ptb

ROC—PASS question

Totally satisfied, slightly satisfied, not satisfied, not at all satisfied

Patients reporting being totally satisfied or slightly satisfied—optimal point on curve (MCID)

19, 25, 25 ptb

Escobar 2013 (TKR) [16]

Anchor—transition question

A great deal better, somewhat better, equal, somewhat worse, a great deal worse

Mean change in patients “somewhat better” (MCID)

30 pt

ROC—transition question

A great deal better, somewhat better, equal, somewhat worse, a great deal worse

Mean change in patients “somewhat better” (MCID)

20–24 ptc

Anchor—question about satisfaction

Very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied

Patient “somewhat satisfied” (MCID)

27 pt

SF-36 bodily pain (0–100 pt scale)

Angst 2001 (inpatient rehabilitation) [13]

Anchor—“transition” questionnaire

Much worse, slightly worse, equal, slightly better, much better

Improvement MCID = Difference btw “equal” and “slightly better” (MCID)

7.8 pt for improvement

Escobar 2007 (TKR) [14]

Anchor—“transition” question at 6 months or 2 years

A great deal better, somewhat better, equal, somewhat worse, a great deal worse

Difference btw baseline score and scores for patients declaring changes “somewhat better” (MCID)

17 pt

  1. Btw between, PASS Patient Acceptable Symptom, THR total hip replacement, pt point, TKR total knee replacement.
  2. aOn a 0–10 point scale.
  3. bMCID is reported for different patients’ baseline pain, divided in tertiles.
  4. cData for one cohort (derivation cohort) only are shown.